|
Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark DataBase
Release 21 (August 2020) Standard Reference Database 101
National Institute of Standards and Technology
|
|
|
|
You are here: Comparisons > Vibrations > Vibrations > 2 calculations
|
Compare vibrational frequencies for two calculations
for H2OCH3OH (water methanol dimer)
A =
HF/6-31G*
B =
MP2/6-31G*
scale factors=0.8985, 0.943
| |
symmetry |
|
frequency (cm-1) |
|
reduced mass (amu) |
|
IR Intensity (km mol-1) |
| mode number |
A |
B |
|
A |
B |
diff. |
ratio |
|
A |
B |
diff. |
ratio |
|
A |
B |
diff. |
ratio |
| 1 |
A |
A |
|
3739 |
3656 |
82.9 |
1.023 |
|
1.079 |
1.076 |
0.003 |
1.003 |
|
123.40 |
88.62 |
1.392 |
| 2 |
A |
A |
|
3697 |
3562 |
134.8 |
1.038 |
|
1.067 |
1.066 |
0.001 |
1.001 |
|
60.90 |
39.32 |
1.549 |
| 3 |
A |
A |
|
3619 |
3480 |
138.4 |
1.040 |
|
1.050 |
1.052 |
-0.002 |
0.998 |
|
199.87 |
221.28 |
0.903 |
| 4 |
A |
A |
|
2986 |
3051 |
-65.4 |
0.979 |
|
1.102 |
1.104 |
-0.003 |
0.998 |
|
36.36 |
20.80 |
1.748 |
| 5 |
A |
A |
|
2931 |
3006 |
-75.5 |
0.975 |
|
1.107 |
1.108 |
-0.001 |
0.999 |
|
74.55 |
34.45 |
2.164 |
| 6 |
A |
A |
|
2880 |
2926 |
-46.5 |
0.984 |
|
1.035 |
1.033 |
0.002 |
1.002 |
|
55.24 |
37.01 |
1.493 |
| 7 |
A |
A |
|
1665 |
1667 |
-2.3 |
0.999 |
|
1.078 |
1.077 |
0.001 |
1.001 |
|
96.43 |
71.08 |
1.357 |
| 8 |
A |
A |
|
1492 |
1483 |
9.4 |
1.006 |
|
1.048 |
1.047 |
0.001 |
1.001 |
|
2.93 |
4.19 |
0.699 |
| 9 |
A |
A |
|
1482 |
1476 |
6.2 |
1.004 |
|
1.049 |
1.051 |
-0.002 |
0.998 |
|
2.12 |
3.82 |
0.555 |
| 10 |
A |
A |
|
1470 |
1446 |
23.8 |
1.016 |
|
1.151 |
1.147 |
0.005 |
1.004 |
|
11.21 |
4.09 |
2.741 |
| 11 |
A |
A |
|
1352 |
1331 |
20.7 |
1.016 |
|
1.299 |
1.272 |
0.027 |
1.021 |
|
46.66 |
31.94 |
1.461 |
| 12 |
A |
A |
|
1160 |
1137 |
22.8 |
1.020 |
|
1.265 |
1.255 |
0.010 |
1.008 |
|
3.09 |
0.29 |
10.655 |
| 13 |
A |
A |
|
1052 |
1041 |
11.0 |
1.011 |
|
4.173 |
1.197 |
2.976
3.485 |
|
157.81 |
11.79 |
13.382 |
| 14 |
A |
A |
|
1049 |
1007 |
41.7 |
1.041 |
|
1.194 |
4.429 |
-3.235
0.270 |
|
8.46 |
118.93 |
0.071 |
| 15 |
A |
A |
|
537 |
621 |
-84.3 |
0.864 |
|
1.046 |
1.036 |
0.010 |
1.010 |
|
179.51 |
170.18 |
1.055 |
| 16 |
A |
A |
|
357 |
468 |
-111.3 |
0.762 |
|
1.109 |
1.081 |
0.028 |
1.026 |
|
96.53 |
23.75 |
4.065 |
| 17 |
A |
A |
|
255 |
276 |
-21.1 |
0.924 |
|
1.033 |
1.127 |
-0.094 |
0.916 |
|
154.73 |
234.79 |
0.659 |
| 18 |
A |
A |
|
158 |
191 |
-33.1 |
0.826 |
|
5.365 |
4.232 |
1.133
1.268 |
|
2.63 |
4.97 |
0.529 |
| 19 |
A |
A |
|
105 |
124 |
-19.4 |
0.844 |
|
1.099 |
1.358 |
-0.258
0.810 |
|
141.48 |
131.91 |
1.073 |
| 20 |
A |
A |
|
41 |
91 |
-49.5 |
0.454 |
|
1.459 |
2.022 |
-0.564
0.721 |
|
30.40 |
17.27 |
1.761 |
| 21 |
A |
A |
|
28 |
69 |
-40.5 |
0.411 |
|
1.867 |
1.086 |
0.780
1.718 |
|
2.24 |
40.27 |
0.056 |
| scaled by |
|
|
0.8985 |
0.943 |
See section III.C.1 List or set vibrational scaling factors
to change the scale factors used here.
See section III.C.2
Calculate a vibrational scaling factor for a given set of molecules
to determine the least squares best scaling factor.