return to home page Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark DataBase Release 22 (May 2022) Standard Reference Database 101 National Institute of Standards and Technology
You are here: Calculated > Vibrations > Bad Calculations > Bad vib. Calc. vs exp. OR Resources > Bad Calculations > Vibrations > Bad vib. Calc. vs exp.

Bad vibrational frequency predictions

19 02 11 15 45

Calculated frequencies that differ from experiment by more than 400 cm-1 or have a ratio with experiment outside of 0.7 to 1.2 are listed

Calculated vibrational frequencies ("theory" in table) are calculated at CCSD=FULL/aug-cc-pVQZ
Calculated values were scaled by 1.

Species Name mode int rot Symmetry Experiment Theory difference ratio
LiOH lithium hydroxide 1 Σ 3688 4101 413 0.899
LiOH lithium hydroxide 3 Π 257 439 183 0.584
C2H Ethynyl radical 3 torsion Π 372 556 185 0.668
NaH sodium hydride 1 Σ 1133 2192 1059 0.517
MgF2 Magnesium fluoride 3 Πu 165 135 -30 1.219
AsSe Arsenic monoselenide 1 Σ 280 429 149 0.653
Li2O dilithium oxide 3 Πu 112 -151 -263 -0.737
SiC2 Silicon dicarbide 3 B2 196 155 -42 1.268
C3 carbon trimer 3 Πu 63 47 -17 1.357
S3 Sulfur trimer 2 A1 281 631 350 0.445
SiH2D2 silane-d2 6 B1 2183 1673 -510 1.305
SiH2D2 silane-d2 8 B2 1601 2314 713 0.692
AlCN Aluminum monocyanide 3 Π 132 191 59 0.691
Mg2 Magnesium diatomic 1 Σg 48 37 -11 1.304