return to home page Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark DataBase Release 22 (May 2022) Standard Reference Database 101 National Institute of Standards and Technology
You are here: Calculated > Vibrations > Bad Calculations > Bad vib. Calc. vs exp. OR Resources > Bad Calculations > Vibrations > Bad vib. Calc. vs exp.

Bad vibrational frequency predictions

19 02 11 15 45

Calculated frequencies that differ from experiment by more than 400 cm-1 or have a ratio with experiment outside of 0.7 to 1.2 are listed

Calculated vibrational frequencies ("theory" in table) are calculated at QCISD(TQ)=FULL/6-31G*
Calculated values were scaled by 1.

Species Name mode int rot Symmetry Experiment Theory difference ratio
HCN+ hydrogen cyanide cation 3 Π 760 2234 1474 0.340
HCNO fulminic acid 5 torsion Π 224 -172 -396 -1.304
C2H Ethynyl radical 3 torsion Π 372 266 -106 1.398
CH3 Methyl radical 2 torsion A2" 606 435 -172 1.395
CH2OH Hydroxymethyl radical 8 torsion A 482 738 256 0.653
CH2OH Hydroxymethyl radical 9 torsion A 234 450 216 0.520
OClO- Chlorine dioxide anion 2 A1 418 329 -89 1.272
VO Vanadium monoxide 1 Σ 1002 2674 1673 0.374
Li2O dilithium oxide 3 Πu 112 78 -34 1.433
FO Oxygen monofluoride 1 Σ 1033 699 -334 1.478
S3 Sulfur trimer 2 A1 281 563 282 0.499
SiH2D2 silane-d2 6 B1 2183 1643 -540 1.328
SiH2D2 silane-d2 8 B2 1601 2273 672 0.705
CaS Calcium sulfide 1 Σ 459 364 -94 1.259
H2OH2O water dimer 7 A' 143 207 64 0.692
H2OH2O water dimer 8 A' 103 148 45 0.695
H2OH2O water dimer 11 A" 108 162 54 0.667
ONNO NO dimer 4 torsion A2 117 192 75 0.608